USPTO serial 76515536
ZETTAFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZETTAFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy B. Gray
BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DRSTE 1100MCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated circuits and integrated circuits featuring semiconductor devices and molecular memories that use the transfer of electrical charges to store and relay data | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of integrated circuits and integrated circuits featuring semiconductor devices and molecular memories that use the transfer of electrical charges to store and relay data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, design, and development for others in the field of integrated circuits and integrated circuits featuring semiconductor devices and molecular memories that use the transfer of electrical charges to store and relay data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zettacore Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zettacore Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ZETTAFLASH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |