Drawing for QUALITY

USPTO serial 76515615

QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael I. Kroll

MICHAEL I KROLL171 STILLWELL LNSYOSSET, NY 11791-1913UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012motor vehicle parts, namely, transmissionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 13, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 12, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 9, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance