USPTO serial 76515633
CHESSCAPADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHESSCAPADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOOK, Hampshire RG27 9XA, GB
HOOK, Hampshire RG27 9XA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Westervelt
DEBORAH J WESTERVELT LAW OFFICES OF ROYAL W. CRAIG, PC10 N CALVERT ST STE 153BALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC GAMES SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC GAMES ON PRE-RECORDED MEDIA; COMPUTER GAMES PROGRAMS ENCODED IN MEMORY DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A COMPUTER GAME THAT MAY BE ACCESSED BY NETWORK USERS OVER NETWORKS, INCLUDING COMPUTER NETWORKS AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superscape Group plc
- Other trademarks owned by Superscape Group plc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CHESSCAPADE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |