Drawing for FRESH

USPTO serial 76515697

FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Sharinn

TODD S SHARINN BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PROJECT KITS FOR PAINTING, CONTAINING AN ASSORTMENT OF PAINTING TOOLS, NAMELY, PAINT ROLLERS, PAINT PADS, PAINT TRAYS AND PAINT BRUSHESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance