USPTO serial 76515769
BB BORIS BECKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BB BORIS BECKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-8640 Hurden, CH
CH-8640 Hurden, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Sanok
JEFFREY D. SANOK CROWELL & MORING, LLP1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery; Essential oils for personal use; Cosmetics, namely eye, facial and foundation makeup; Lotions, namely skin, sun protection and facial creams; Lip balm (non-medicated); Lipstick; Lip liner; Lip gloss; Lip cream; Shaving foam, gel and lotion; Hair lotions; Soaps for personal use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |