USPTO serial 76515783
ORAFTI ACTIVE FOOD INGREDIENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3557914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORAFTI ACTIVE FOOD INGREDIENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
B 1150 Brussels (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre), BE
Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
B 1150 Brussels (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre), BE
Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
B 1150 Brussels (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre), BE
Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MEDIATION IN BUSINESS AFFAIRS IN RESPECT OF SALE AND IN RESPECT OF WHOLESALE SERVICES; COMMERCIAL MEDIATION IN RESPECT OF SUGAR AND RELATED PRODUCTS, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, AND DRINKS; COMMERCIAL MEDIATION IN RESPECT OF SALE AND EXPORT OF SUGAR AND RELATED PRODUCTS, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, AND DRINKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORAFTI ACTIVE FOOD INGREDIENTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 12, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |