USPTO serial 76515933
ACTI-PLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2006
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTI-PLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CARMANAH DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING INC.
VANCOUVER, CA
Other trademarks owned by CARMANAH DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING INC.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
Tanya M. Reitzel Coastal Trademark Services1081 Cambie StreetVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machinery, namely an abrader plate that is installed on a debarking drum or chamber | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARMANAH DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE Wood Products G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE Wood Products G.P.
- Other trademarks owned by CAE Wood Products G.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ACTI-PLATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |