USPTO serial 76516062
MOLD-AWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOLD-AWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLEVELAND R WILLIAMS
2501 E CHAPMAN AVE #100FULLERTON, CA 92831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Moisture absorbing kits, comprising, chemical compositions and apparatus, namely, silica gel, zeolite molecular sieves, clay, lime, calcium chloride, desiccant bags, synthetic bags, and plastic trays, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |