USPTO serial 76516259
LUXURY RESIDENCES NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3509061Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LUXURY RESIDENCES NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
Robert W. Adams NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 North Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate services, namely, operating marketplaces for real estate transactions, namely, real estate brokerage, investment and leasing; financial investment services in the real estate field; financial valuations and appraisals of real estate for purchase, sale, rental or insurance claims; providing information in the field of real estate by means of linking the web site to other web sites featuring real estate information; real estate brokerage and listing services relating to the sale, purchase and rental of real estate; and real estate referral services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 8, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |