Drawing for TEA WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE

USPTO serial 76516480

TEA WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2927287Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 22, 2005
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TEA WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carlo F. Van den Bosch - Timothy L. Epp - Brian M. Daucher - Michelle M. LaVoie

CARLO F VAN DEN BOSCH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4TH FL650 TOWN CTR DRCOSTA MESA, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Teas, herbal teas, iced teas, [ tea bags ], tea based beverages, [ candy breath mints, and chewing gum ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 24, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 7, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 2, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2007A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 22, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2006AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 27, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance