USPTO serial 76516846
INSPIRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSPIRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, DK
DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Barritt
Keith Barritt Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, needles for injection | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |