USPTO serial 76517027
KANGEN WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2990706Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KANGEN WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald M. Goldman
DANIEL M. CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP1333 2ND STREETSUITE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-4110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electrolytic water generators for electrically decomposing tap water to generate electrolytic water and for removing chlorine odor from tap water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 23, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |