USPTO serial 76517059
CRYOLAC CRYOGENIC LASERABLATION CHAMBER FOR FROZEN MATERIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3342384Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYOLAC CRYOGENIC LASERABLATION CHAMBER FOR FROZEN MATERIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
D-27515 Bremerhaven, DE
Other trademarks owned by Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
D-27515 Bremerhaven, DE
Other trademarks owned by Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
D-27515 Bremerhaven, DE
Other trademarks owned by Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANN86 SPARKS STPO BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments making use of laser ablation processes for determining the properties of sedimentary materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
- Other trademarks owned by Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
- Other trademarks owned by Alfred-Wegener-Institut fuer Polar- und Meeres...
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CRYOLAC CRYOGENIC LASERABLATION CHAMBER FOR FROZEN MATERIALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |