USPTO serial 76517154
2 WAY EPHEDRINE MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 2 WAY EPHEDRINE MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lithia Springs, GA
Lithia Springs, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Todd Merolla
JEANENE L JOBST ESQ WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLC1201 W PEACHTREE ST STE 3500ONE ATLANTIC CTRATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceuticals and over-the-counter preparations for the treatment of bronchial asthma, shortness of breath, phlegm and mucus congestion, tightness of chest, and wheezing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |