Drawing for WORLD ROBOT HALL OF FAME

USPTO serial 76517250

WORLD ROBOT HALL OF FAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD ROBOT HALL OF FAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis A. DePaul

LOUIS A DEPAUL REED SMITH LLPPO BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-0488UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational and entertainment services, namely, services rendered in connection with the operation of a museum and library providing exhibits and displays regarding robots; conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of robotics, and distributing course materials in connection therewith; providing recognition and awards to those who demonstrate excellence in the field of roboticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 21, 2004LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Jun 10, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance