USPTO serial 76517338
FONDANTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3088862Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2006
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FONDANTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paris Gourmet of New York Inc.
Carlstadt, NJ
B-1702 GROOT-BIJGAARDE, BE
RUNGIS, FR
SOCIETE DE FABRICATION ET DE DISTRIBUTION DE PRODUITS ALIMENTAIRES PATISFRANCE
RUNGIS, FR
SOCIETE DE FABRICATION ET DE DISTRIBUTION DE PRODUITS ALIMENTAIRES PATISFRANCE
RUNGIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. McElwaine
John C. McElwaine Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP100 North Tryon Street42nd Floor, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pastry and confection preparations, namely almond paste used in the baking of pastries and baked goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paris Gourmet of New York Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PURATOS, N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by PATISFRANCE-PURATOS
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DE FABRICATION ET DE DISTRIBUTION DE PRODUITS ALIMENTAIRES PATISFRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DE FABRICATION ET DE DISTRIBUTION DE PRODUITS ALIMENTAIRES PATISFRANCE
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FONDANTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 2, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 2, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |