USPTO serial 76517363
AUDIOHAUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUDIOHAUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buena Park, CA
Buena Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard E O'Connor Jr.
BERNARD E OCONNOR JR BERNARD E O'CONNOR JR. PC21515 HAWTHORNE BLVD #1150TORRANCE, CA 90503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOME AUDIO AND VIDEO SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY, AUDIO SPEAKER, WOOFERS, TWEETERS AND AMPLIFIERS, CAPACITORS, SIGNAL PROCESSORS, SPEAKER ENCLOSURES, ANTENNAS, AUDIO CROSSOVERS, DECODERS, DVD PLAYERS, ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, ELECTRIC SWITCHES, GRAPHIC EQUALIZERS, VIDEO MONITORS, STEREO TUNERS, TELEVISIONS SETS REMOTE CONTROLS FOR STEREOS AND TELEVISIONS TO CONTROL SOUND, BASS, TREBLE, COLOR, INTENSITY OF IMAGE, AND LIKE USES, ELECTRICAL CABLES, ELECTRIC FUSE BOXES, AND SOUND DISTRIBUTION CONSOLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | FURNITURE TO ACCOMMODATE HOME AUDIO AND VIDEO SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS; NAMELY, CABINETS, ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS, WALL UNITS AND STORAGE UNITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |