Drawing for CANADA MARK

USPTO serial 76517467

CANADA MARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANADA MARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brewster Taylor

BREWSTER TAYLOR LARSON & TAYLOR, PLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS; GOODS MADE FROM PRECIOUS METAL, NAMELY, WATCHES, STOP WATCHES, CHRONOMETERS, AND CLOCKS; PRECIOUS STONES INCLUDING DIAMONDS; JEWELRYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 21, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance