Drawing for QUIET ALUMINUM

USPTO serial 76517587

QUIET ALUMINUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUIET ALUMINUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold V. Stotland

HAROLD V STOTLAND SEYFARTH SHAW LLP131 S DEARBORN ST STE 2400CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006material in the form of a sandwich consisting of outer metal sheets and a non-metal sheet between them, which material is sold to customers who fabricate it into noise-reduction productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance