Drawing for IT'S MORE THAN A HAT, IT'S A MESSAGE

USPTO serial 76517613

IT'S MORE THAN A HAT, IT'S A MESSAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S MORE THAN A HAT, IT'S A MESSAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Z. Peter Sawicki

Z PETER SAWICKI WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY PA900 2ND AVE S STE 1400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035SALE SERVICES FOR HATS, T-SHIRTS, BOOKS, STICKERS AND STATIONARY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, DISPLAYS IN RETAIL STORES AND THROUGH PERSONAL CONTACTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 1, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 1, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2004REINREINSTATED—
May 5, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 13, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance