USPTO serial 76517655
KIBIBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIBIBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA A. GUNTER
BARBARA A GUNTER KIBIBI LLC2 HACKAMORE CTTINTON FALLS, NJ 07753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |