USPTO serial 76517789
µ-CHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with µ-CHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle C. Burke
MICHELLE C. BURKE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W. MONROE STREET SUITE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated circuit chips; compact disc and digital videodisc embedded with integrated circuit chips for the purpose of prevention of content piracy; circuit board embedded with integrated circuit chips; paper embedded with integrated circuit chips which can be programmed for security, identification, authentication, or prevention of copying; paper or tag embedded with integrated circuit chips for the purpose of identification, tracking, logistics, supply chain management, or recycle control of products in the field of manufacturing; integrated circuit cards; blank magnetically encoded identity cards; all of the foregoing not for use in connection with financial services, namely, payment card, bank card, debit card, charge card, magnetic encoded financial transaction card, financial transaction smart card, telephone calling card, stored value and/or prepaid card services, and not for use on or as payment cards bank cards, debit cards, credit cards, charge cards, magnetic encoded financial transaction cards, financial transaction smart cards, telephone calling cards, stored value and/or prepaid cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Blank non-magnetically encoded identity cards, not for use in connection with financial services, namely, payment card, bank card, debit card, charge card, magnetic encoded financial transaction card, financial transaction smart card, telephone calling card, stored value and/or prepaid card services, and not for use on or as payment cards bank cards, debit cards, credit cards, charge cards, magnetic encoded financial transaction cards, financial transaction smart cards, telephone calling cards, stored value and/or prepaid cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named µ-CHIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |