Drawing for LEDERMA

USPTO serial 76517940

LEDERMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEDERMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morland C. Fischer

MORLAND C FISCHER LAW OFFICES OF MORLAND C. FISCHER2030 MAIN ST STE 1050IRVINE, CA 92614-7254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated oils, lotions, creams, gels, solutions and sprays applied to the skin for tanning and accelerating tanning of the skinACTIVE—
005oils, lotions, creams, gels, solutions and sprays containing medications applied to the skin for tanning and accelerating tanning of the skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2006INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 16, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance