USPTO serial 76518254
ORT EDUCATING FOR LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORT EDUCATING FOR LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1211 Geneve 20, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aoi Nawashiro
AOI NAWASHIRO BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLCSTE 300624 NINTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING, PROVIDING FUNDRAISING SERVICES FOR ENDOWMENT PROGRAMS FOR CHARITIES, PROVIDING FINANCIAL PLANNING SERVICES FOR DONORS AND RECIPIENTS, AND PROVIDING SCHOLARSHIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AT THE HIGH-SCHOOL, COLLEGE AND POST-SECONDARY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE LEVEL; COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING AND TRAINING OF TEACHERS OF COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING; AND CONDUCTING ON-LINE AND CLASSROOM CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF THE WORK OF THE ORGANIZATION AND FUNDRAISING TECHNIQUES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |