USPTO serial 76518286
ROUGH STUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUGH STUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Hoffman
GARY M HOFFMAN DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP1177 AVE OF THE AMERICAS41ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10036-2714Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Plastic bags for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 13, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |