Drawing for ULTRA LITE THE PROFESSIONAL WEIGHT AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

USPTO serial 76518440

ULTRA LITE THE PROFESSIONAL WEIGHT AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2907722Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 7, 2004
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ULTRA LITE THE PROFESSIONAL WEIGHT AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD P. GEORGET

244 Fifth AvenueSuite 2325New York, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Diet pills and capsules; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, appetite suppressants; herbal products, namely, herbs used for weight loss; herbal teas for medicinal purposes, namely, weight loss; mineral and vitamin supplements; nutritional additives for weight lossSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
044Health care for humans; beauty care for humans; weight reduction diet planning; pharmaceutical advice; physical therapySECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 1, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2011NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 16, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 25, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance