Drawing for ROBBINS BROS.

USPTO serial 76518524

ROBBINS BROS.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBBINS BROS.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Alison Grabell

THOMAS M SMALL BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL JEWELRY STORE SERVICESACTIVESep 15, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 30, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 6, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 6, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance