USPTO serial 76518659
CONTENTMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTENTMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lexington, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd E. Stockwell
TODD E STOCKWELL STOCKWELL & ASSOCIATES, PSC861 CORPORATE DR STE 201LEXINGTON, KY 40503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PUBLICATION OF EDITORIAL CONTENT OF SITES ACCESSIBLE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |