USPTO serial 76519718
CLINAVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLINAVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOUCHERVILLE QUEBEC, CA
BOUCHERVILLE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
BOUCHERVILLE, PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
Boucherville, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III
Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Multiple vitamins for intravenous infusion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDOZ CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SABEX INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SABEX INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SABEX 2002 INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CLINAVIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |