Drawing for WAI LANA'S LITTLE YOGIS

USPTO serial 76520303

WAI LANA'S LITTLE YOGIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAI LANA'S LITTLE YOGIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin Hsia

Martin Hsia Cades Schutte a limited liability law partnership1000 Bishop Street12th FloorHonolulu, HI 96813

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Ale, beer, sweet cider, fruit drinks, fruit juice, ginger ale, vegetable juice beverage, lemonade, mineral water, soda water, carbonated soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, sports drinks, table water, syrups for making soft drinks, and fruit flavored soft drinksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 4, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 6, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Aug 30, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 6, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 4, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 1, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 17, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 17, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 17, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 30, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 7, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 9, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance