Drawing for BIRKENSTOCK

USPTO serial 76521023

BIRKENSTOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIRKENSTOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allen R. Morganstern

ALLEN R MORGANSTERN MORGANSTERN & QUATELA310 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PotpourriACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
011Candle Accessories, namely, candle lanternsACTIVE—
021Candle holders not of precious metalACTIVE—
031Horticultural Items, namely, dried plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 12, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance