Drawing for BLEEDING EDGE

USPTO serial 76521394

BLEEDING EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLEEDING EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Shimokaji

MICHAEL A SHIMOKAJI SHIMOKAJI & ASSOCIATES PC8911 RESEARCH DRIRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films, pre-recorded videotapes, cassettes, and discs featuring Gothic popular culture, fashion, and musicACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production of motion picture films, webcasts programs, pre-recorded videotapes, cassettes, and discs featuring Gothic popular culture, fashion, and musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 30, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 30, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 6, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance