USPTO serial 76521756
BOUQUET OF MOLDOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOUQUET OF MOLDOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY BRANDY, CHAMPAGNE, SPARKLING WINE, VODKA, AND WINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |