Drawing for PRASENTIA

USPTO serial 76522019

PRASENTIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRASENTIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jesse A. Hirshman

JESSE A HIRSHMAN KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLPHENRY W OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Supervisory, Control and Data Acquisition ("SCADA") computer software and systems comprised of Hardware Servers, Server Software, Client Software and Communications Networks; and Data Acquisition, Storage and Analysis Systems comprised of Hardware Servers, Server Software, Client Software and Communications Networks; local area networks; and wide area networks, all of the foregoing for the operation, control and monitoring of windparksACTIVE—
037Installation of computer control systems, data acquisition systems and data analysis systems for windparksACTIVE—
042Designing computerized control systems, data acquisition systems and data analysis systems for windparksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance