Drawing for BERMUDA TRIANGLE

USPTO serial 76523580

BERMUDA TRIANGLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERMUDA TRIANGLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Tanning services for human beingsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2010WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
May 3, 2010WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 11, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 30, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 30, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 27, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 26, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 23, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 22, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 13, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 31, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 30, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 15, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Aug 21, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 7, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 30, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 28, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance