Drawing for BIONICHE DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 76523725

BIONICHE DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIONICHE DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, including on-line rater training instructionACTIVEMay 6, 1997
042Consulting services in the field of clinical researchACTIVEMay 6, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 30, 2004PRIMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED
Jul 29, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance