Drawing for DELI FRUITY ICE CREAM

USPTO serial 76523733

DELI FRUITY ICE CREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELI FRUITY ICE CREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Gast

DAVID A GAST HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030ice creamACTIVESep 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 8, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 22, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 5, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Oct 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 3, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 15, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 2, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance