Drawing for EATING FOR LIFE

USPTO serial 76524353

EATING FOR LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EATING FOR LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charlene M. Krogh

Charlene M. Krogh Dorsey & Whitney LLP370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4700IP DepartmentDenver, CO 80202-5647

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded audio tapes and prerecorded video tapes on nutrition, health, exercise, bodybuilding and wellnessACTIVE—
016books, newsletters, pamphlets, magazines and brochures having to do with nutrition, health, exercise, bodybuilding and wellnessACTIVE—
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing instruction and training by means of written materials, prerecorded audio and video tapes, and broadcast radio and television programs on nutrition, health, exercise, bodybuilding and wellnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 26, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 6, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 31, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 31, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance