USPTO serial 76524358
BLACK I T PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLACK I T PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Evergreen Plaza, IL
Evergreen Plaza, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Kendall
JOHN S KENDALL DAVIS & KENDALL PC27 N WACKER DR STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINES FEATURING THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, AND BUSINESS PROFILING PERIODICALS RELATED TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, AND PAPER BANNERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |