Drawing for CARB-O-LESS-IOUS

USPTO serial 76524400

CARB-O-LESS-IOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARB-O-LESS-IOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ted D. Lee

MICHELLE L EVANS700 N ST MARY'S STE 1500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Low carbohydrate baked goods, namely, cakes, cookies, brownies, pies, breads, muffins, donuts, granola cereal, granola bars, and pretzelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 30, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 1, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 24, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance