Drawing for THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA WAX 'N DRY

USPTO serial 76524807

THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA WAX 'N DRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA WAX 'N DRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SPRAY-ON WAX PRODUCT FOR VEHICLESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 3, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance