USPTO serial 76524871
LINEA VIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534405Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LINEA VIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, CA
VANCOUVER, CA
Vancouver, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana B. Robinson
DANA B. ROBINSON Dana Robinson & AssociatesP.O. Box 1416La Jolla, CA 92038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Social introduction agencies and computer dating services via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELIGENCE (CANADA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELIGENCE (CANADA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Chromatic Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chromatic Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LINEA VIVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |