USPTO serial 76526049
DATA ACCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DATA ACCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward A. Pennington
EDWARD A PENNINGTON SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN LLP3000 K ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | telephone calling card services | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2002 |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, video, data, documents, and graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic,cable, and satellite transmissions; telecommunications gateway services; fiber optic network services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; facsimile transmission services; telephone voice messaging services; paging services; call forwarding and transfer services; caller identification services; call waiting services; speed dialing services; toll free services; conference calling services; Internet dial-up access services; unified messaging services for integrating voice mail and e-mail in one location;providing frame relay connectivity services for data transfer; virtual network telecommunications services; audio and video teleconferencing services; private line voice, text ,facsimile, video and data telecommunications services; integrated services digital network (ISDN) telecommunications services; 800 telecommunications services; 900 telecommunications services; switched voice, data, video and multimedia services; asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) services; location independent personal communications services comprising mobile, voice, data and facsimile services | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |