Drawing for C-FOCAS

USPTO serial 76526165

C-FOCAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C-FOCAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Testing equipment for simulating engine aging of catalytic converters, particulate traps, NOx absorbers, HC traps, emission controls, after treatment systems, exhaust pipes, turbochargers, mufflers, EGR valves, EGR coolers, sensors, exhaust manifolds, heat exchangers, spark plugs, and glow plugs that are exposed to an exhaust gas environmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 23, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2005ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED
Aug 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance