Drawing for DIVX CERTIFIED

USPTO serial 76526460

DIVX CERTIFIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVX CERTIFIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANE SHAY WALD

JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips; semiconductor processors; semiconductor processor chips; microprocessors; electronic circuit boards;computer memory devices; semiconductor memory devices; video circuit boards; audio circuit boards; audio-video circuit boards; video graphic accelerators; video processorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 3, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 10, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance