Drawing for BRILLIANT IMAGING

USPTO serial 76527586

BRILLIANT IMAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRILLIANT IMAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. O'Connell, Jr.

ROBERT M. O'CONNELL, JR. GOODWIN PROCTER LLPEXCHANGE PLACE, 53 STATE STREETATTN: TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109-2881

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005(Based on Intent to Use) Pharmaceuticals and therapeutics for use in detecting and/or treating vascular disease, peripheral occlusive disease, breast cancer, female sexual arousal dysfunction, atherosclerosis and myocardial perfusion, venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and blood clots; medical imaging contrast agents and magnetic resonance imaging agentsACTIVE—
035(Based on Intent to Use) Licensing technology to others in the field of medical imaging contrast agents and magnetic resonance imaging agentsACTIVE—
042Medical research; research and development of medical imaging contrast agents and magnetic resonance imaging agentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance