USPTO serial 76527837
ECOSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Marys, South Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Fisher
THOMAS E FISHER WATTS HOFFMANN FISHER HEINKE CO LPA1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1750CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | EVAPORATIVE COOLERS AND PARTS THEREFOR; HUMIDIFIERS AND PARTS THEREFOR; APPARATUS FOR HEATING, NAMELY GAS FIRED HEATERS SUITABLE FOR DUCTED AIR DISTRIBUTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |