USPTO serial 76527912
MIKKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIKKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dorking, Surrey RH4 3YX, GB
Dorking, Surrey RH4 3YX, GB
DORKING, SURREY RH4 3YX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Garrison
DAVID L GARRISON GARRISON & ASSOCIATES PS2001 SIXTH AVE STE 3300SEATTLE, WA 98121-2522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | animal shampoo | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | animal health appliances, namely, first aid kits, hygiene pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | animal grooming aids, namely, rakes, mat breakers, stripping knives, shedding blades, undercoat rakes, tick pickers, scissors, nail clippers, and nail files. | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | animal training whistles. | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | animal health appliances, namely, pill guns, feeding syringes, oral hygiene brushes and massagers | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | animal training devices, namely, canvas animal dummies, leads, training harnesses, halters, dumbbells, and sisal bones | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | animal beds | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | animal grooming aids, namely, gloves, mittens, combs, brushes, and pet food servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interpet Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Interpet Limited
- Other trademarks owned by INTERPET LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MIKKI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |