USPTO serial 76528572
RPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-89079 Ulm, DE
D-89079 Ulm, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TONI-JUNELL HERBERT
TONI-JUNELL HERBERT REED SMITH LLP3110 FAIRVIEW PARK DRSTE 1400FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FULL LINE OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |