USPTO serial 76528686
GTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Okayama-city, JP
Okayama-city, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G. GENTNER
MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOLS; PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AT THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVEL, SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL, UNIVERSITY LEVEL, AND POST-GRADUATE LEVEL; DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES; DEVELOPING EDUCATIONAL MANUALS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |